-
STRATEGY
OPERATIONS
-
PTC
OPTIMIZATION & COHERENCY -
PTC
CUSTOMER MARGINS -
PS/TS
INVESTMENTS & INCENTIVES -
PS/TS
TRADE SPEND OPTIMIZATION -
Assortment
MANAGEMENT
|
Operations |
PTC – Optimization & Coherency Pricing Terms & Conditions – Optimization & Coherency across Channels |
Priority : 0 |
Capability : 0 |
||
|
Statement |
Coherent pricing structure across channel is continuously monitored and evaluated, with targeted adjustments made to optimize revenue ensuring fair and equitable trading practices. Pay for performance, terms and conditions consider end-to-end channel P&L analysis – with net profit and share goals vs competitive moves - from upstream revenue growth (revenue, discounts, allowances, COGS, profit) to downstream (sales, logistics, execution, administrative) cost-to-serve elements. |
||||
|
Score |
Low - Basic |
Medium - Advanced |
High - Expert |
||
|
. |
Market realities dictate that the PTC is static. Scanned data from providers such as Nielsen are used to support the competitive assessment process. |
Investments impact overall price performance across channels are continuously monitored and optimized. Price and pack gaps vs competition are identified and tackled on a fast-reaction mode. |
Price coherency across channels are set in line with competitive moves and price gaps by occasion, channel / customer and time of the year. Automated knowledge-based systems (AI) and consumer-led research methodologies are adopted to support price point targeting and price tracking. |
||
|
Issues / Implications |
Market realities dictate that the PTC is dynamic vs. static. Pay-for-performance levers need to be understood and optimized. Include managing coherency across customers to drive ROI and ease supply constraints. |
||||
|
Evidence / Clarification |
Where available, scanned data from providers such as Nielsen is used to support this process. |
||||
|
Action It Leads To |
Adoption of consumer led research methodologies to support price point targeting and price tracking. |
||||
|
KPI / Directions |
Indicator: P&L breakdown by channel. Directions: waterfall P&L analysis and channel P&L (CHAMPS RGM Module & System Economics) Tools. |
||||
|
Operations |
PTC – Customer Margins Pricing Terms & Conditions - Tiered Pricing & Customer Margins |
Priority : 0 |
Capability : 0 |
||
|
Statement |
Identifying new channel opportunities, customer pricing & margins - Retail / Omnichannel tiered pricing and customer margins are routinely tracked and assessed to ensure compliance and an equitable sharing of profit within the System. |
||||
|
Score |
Low - Basic |
Medium - Advanced |
High - Expert |
||
|
. |
Price terms and conditions by brand and pack across the customers are used to establish coherency in certain (e.g. Supermarkets) channels. |
The PTC frameworks are used to support strategic and tactical decisions. The PTC frameworks are implemented to execute by both channel and customer to mitigate cross-channel cannibalization. PTC framework is used as a dealing tool for specific channels / customers. |
Tiered pricing and margin by customer for System and competitor brands and packs are closely monitored. Waterfall P&L provides strategic profit breakdown layers and is used to support ABP decisions. Price compliance routine for stablishing the commercial & communication action for retaking the price in consumer |
||
|
Issues / Implications |
The System needs to ensure it is taking a leadership role in the level of returns across the whole value chain. Tracking should be measured against customer margin expectations. Customers will have different margin expectations by package role tracking should lead to actions. |
||||
|
Evidence / Clarification |
This data is used to support strategic and tactical decisions and execution by channel and customer. |
||||
|
Action It Leads To |
Pricing and margin tracking by customer for System and competitor brands and packs. |
||||
|
KPI / Directions |
Indicator: P&L Breakdown by Customer. Directions: Waterfall P&L Analysis and Customer P&L (CHAMPS RGM Module & System Economics) Tools. |
||||
|
Operations |
PS/TS – Investments & Incentives Promotional Spend / Trade Spend – Developing Future Promo & Customer Incentives |
Priority : 0 |
Capability : 0 |
||
|
Statement |
Commercial Terms vs Pay for Play Incentives and Promo Design - The System has developed a set of win / win future customer promos that directly link level of planned and paid investment to the level of planned and received support for revenue creating activities and the execution of the PicOS. |
||||
|
Score |
Low - Basic |
Medium - Advanced |
High - Expert |
||
|
. |
Customer alignment and support - adequate customer promos and trade spend processes are delivered in market. |
Customer promos reflect the full range of strategic store and category-building benefits The Coca-Cola System offers and ensure cost/price is not the focus for annual negotiations. |
Development of customer promos, execution and trade spend results are the basis for promo reengineering and trade spend planning. Promo spend with positive ROI is evaluated and considered on ABP. Enhanced customer promo incentives results lead to increased category shopping penetration and market share. |
||
|
Issues / Implications |
Without customer alignment and support, the adequate customer promos and trade spend cannot be delivered in market. Should include processes for non-compliance & impact to ROI, what is the customer ownership/review process that enables higher compliance. Need for return on ad-spend Integrated into promo evaluation tools for B2C. |
||||
|
Evidence / Clarification |
Customer promos reflect the full range of strategic store and category-building benefits The Coca-Cola System offers and ensure cost/price is not the focus for annual negotiations. Trade spend based on overall investments across customers ensuring consistency of the trade spend vs customer value growth. Not all promos expect to turn a profit. It may therefore help to track promos against their stated objectives and then evaluate their impact on net profitability. |
||||
|
Action It Leads To |
Review ROI of customer promos and trade spend results as basis for promo reengineering on RGM optimization. |
||||
|
KPI / Directions |
Indicator: Promo / Trade Spend Breakdown. Directions: Promo ROI Analysis Tool. |
||||
|
Operations |
PS/TS – Trade Spend Optimization Trade Spend Evaluation, Promo ROI Optimization, Communication & Messaging |
Priority : 0 |
Capability : 0 |
||
|
Statement |
Evaluating discounts and allowances, customer specific marketing agreements and price promotions are developed to support the agreed strategy and routinely reviewed to ensure effective investment, guided by the channel price, terms & conditions charter and predetermined promotional spend ROI guidance. |
||||
|
Score |
Low - Basic |
Medium - Advanced |
High - Expert |
||
|
. |
Targeted and effective return on investment is considered on the profit and revenue decision-making process. Discounts are given according to commercial needs |
The reviews occur at least quarterly and findings are used to drive improved return from future activity. The returns to the customer as well as the System are evaluated. Total portfolio assessment is completed and integrated with ABP. Tracking tool development for understanding promo effectiveness on proposed targets |
Budget analysis and review processes are based on promo ROI modeling and promo volume multipliers econometric estimation. Enable assessment of a promo’s performance vs. multiple criteria - eg shopper conversion, driving trial. Advanced tool for understanding & tracking promo/discount impact in total revenue |
||
|
Issues / Implications |
Targeted and effective investment heavily impacts the profitability or revenue growth. Evaluate customer promotions ROI. |
||||
|
Evidence / Clarification |
The reviews must occur at frequency higher than annually especially for the Top 5 spend items. Need for Return on trade spend integrated into promo evaluation tools for digital channels. The returns to the Customer as well as the System are evaluated. |
||||
|
Action It Leads To |
Development of budget, analysis and review processes. |
||||
|
KPI / Directions |
Indicator: Promo / Trade Spend Breakdown. Directions: Promo ROI Analysis Tool. |
||||
|
Operations |
Assortment – Management SKU & Portfolio Management |
Priority : 0 |
Capability : 0 |
||
|
Statement |
The system uses this consumer and shopper analysis to determine by channel where each of the existing System and competitor SKUs by price point fits within the market and identifies System volume and revenue opportunities. |
||||
|
Score |
Low - Basic |
Medium - Advanced |
High - Expert |
||
|
. |
SKUs are mapped and lay the foundations for identifying System brand and pack opportunities by channel. |
Specific gaps in offerings versus the competition, low share for the System and over-dependence on particular occasions, packs, price points or channels are evident from frameworks for reaction and change. |
Assortment optimization modeling is in place for business guidance and SKU mapping by channel, category, segment, brand, package and price point inform the ABP portfolio strategy. |
||
|
Issues / Implications |
Mapping SKUs in this format lays the foundation for identifying System brand and pack opportunities by channel. Needs to include SKU optimization process with selection of potential candidates for being rationalized. |
||||
|
Evidence / Clarification |
Specific gaps in offering versus the competition, low share for the System and over-dependence on particular occasions, packs, price points or channels should become evident. |
||||
|
Action It Leads To |
SKU mapping by channel, category, segment, brand, package and price point. |
||||
|
KPI / Directions |
Indicator: SKU Pareto Analysis. Directions: Assortment Optimizer Tool. |
||||